pf home
Summary for March 10 - March 14, 2008:

Monday, March 10, 2008 

Crew tested after TB found on fishing boat

Nine crew members of an Anacortes-based fishing boat that docked in Seattle on Thursday were given chest X-rays after learning a fellow crew member had likely come down with active tuberculosis, public-health officials said.

 All nine tested negative for active symptoms of the disease, which can be spread person-to-person over time in closed conditions.

 The affected crew member left the boat in early February in Alaska, and health providers in his home state in the Southwest said there was a "high suspicion" he had contracted active TB, said James Apa, spokesman for Public Health — Seattle & King County

 Although a person can have a positive skin test for TB without being sick, cases of active TB require treatment so others aren't infected.

 About a third of the world's population is infected with TB, which kills more people than any other infectious disease. In King County, about 120 to 150 active cases a year are reported to public-health officials.

 "It's an enormous global health issue and so will continue to be an issue locally in places like Seattle with international connections," Apa said. – Seattle Times

Don't forget San Joaquin River salmon

LODI -- In 26 years, a group hoping to restore salmon to California's rivers and streams had never held its annual conference in the San Joaquin Valley.

 Until now.

 The scientists and advocates who gathered here Friday with the nonprofit Salmonid Restoration Federation couldn't have picked a more important time to visit.

 The Central Valley's fall salmon run sank last year to near-record lows. On Tuesday, officials will consider restricting commercial and recreational fishing to help the salmon recover.

 Meanwhile, federal officials are forging ahead with ambitious plans to bring salmon back to a place they haven't been in decades: the upper stretches of the San Joaquin River.

 Make no mistake, experts at the conference said: Salmon have been declining since the Gold Rush, and there's little chance of going back to the old days when the San Joaquin was so full of fish that the sound of their splashing was likened to a waterfall, keeping nearby residents awake at night.

 "I'm not here to cheerlead -- I'm here to lay out the reality of the situation," said Robert Lackey, a fisheries biologist for the Environmental Protection Agency. "The salmon decline is not a recent phenomenon, and it is not a surprise."

 Up and down the West Coast, he said, salmon populations are about 5 percent of historic levels. The most recent dip last fall has been attributed largely to unusual conditions in the Pacific Ocean, where salmon spend their adult lives before returning to the rivers and streams of their birth to spawn. – Stockton Record

Having fun?

Economists have performed their surveys and the answer is: You may not like your job. Construction is the 498th of 500 possible career choices. Only topless dancers and commercial fishermen ranked lower.

Another round of salmon disaster funds suggested

WASHINGTON -- North California Coast Congressman Mike Thompson, D-St, Helena, with Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and 46 senators and representatives from California, Oregon and Washington called on Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez to give Congress the authorization to distribute disaster funds to Pacific Coast commercial fishers and related businesses.

 In a letter to the Secretary, the bipartisan group wrote that if the salmon season is as bad as it was in 2006, when over 90 percent of the season was closed, the Secretary should quickly declare it a federal fisheries failure so Congress can immediately get aid to affected communities. They also called on the Secretary to work closely with California, Oregon and Washington to assess the financial impacts of a limited salmon season.

 “We've already seen the devastating economic effects a closed season can have on salmon fishers and related businesses, particularly in Northern California” said Congressman Thompson.

 “Another closed season would be an even bigger blow to the North Coast. If stocks are as low as predicted, Secretary Guitierrez must act quickly to declare the season a commercial fisheries failure so Congress can help our communities get back on their feet.” – Bay Area Indymedia, California

Sea lion restrictions will remain

JUNEAU -- Federal regulators have issued a new plan aimed at getting the Steller sea lion off the endangered species list.

 One of the plan's major directives is continuing restrictions on commercial fishing in the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska.

 These restrictions, first imposed several years ago, are designed to prevent fishing nets from scooping up fish the sea lions eat near their rookeries and resting rocks.

 Waters around these places are closed up to 20 miles out to sea. And the annual fishing seasons for pollock, cod and mackerel are broken up into pieces spread through the calendar to prevent concentrated catches. -- Pacific Fishing columnist Wesley Loy writing in the Anchorage Daily News

Tuesday, March 11, 2008 

Another war between gear groups

NEWPORT — It hasn’t happened recently.

One part of the fishing industry — salmon, in this case — doesn’t attack another part of the fishing industry — the Pacific whiting fleet — so vehemently as fishermen did Thursday.

Sport and salmon fishermen are stung this year by declining stocks on several rivers that will result in closures or draconian restrictions. Every year during the summer, the fleet that consists mainly of boats under 50 feet and catch high-valued Chinook one at a time, sees 300-foot vessels near the same fishing grounds catching 80 tons or more fish at a whack in big nets and process that fish onboard.

And in those nets are Pacific whiting, also called hake, that are sold as individually frozen filets in supermarkets or ground up and made into imitation crab.

Also in those nets are salmon. Not many, but they’re there. The perception the trawl fleet is taking all the salmon is bigger than what actually takes place.

Commercial trollers in California and Oregon are faced with the option of no fishing at all, so the fact that whiting vessel can catch some Chinook as bycatch is particularly frustrating.

“Zero?” Charleston salmon troller J.D. Evanow said Thursday. “Is that going to stop the 600-foot processors?”

Several salmon fishermen in the room applauded, the same as they did to “Shut down those big corporations. I’m sick of it!” and “What aren’t they telling us?” and similar comments made by others.

But in reality, the at-sea whiting fleet is one of the cleanest fisheries. It uses big nets, but the schooling behavior of the fish allows the fishermen to catch the whiting and few other fish.

Advanced electronics help captains find the big schools.

It’s also one of the mostly closely-regulated fisheries on the West Coast.

The whiting fleet is divided into three sectors:

-- A shoreside fleet of about 40 small trawlers, such as those in Charleston, that deliver to processors on shore;

-- A catcher-processor sector of 10 vessels about 300 feet or less in length, that both catch and process fish on board and stay out at sea for weeks; and

-- A  mother-ship sector, in which there are fewer than a half-dozen vessels that process whiting on board but use small trawl vessels to catch the fish, then deliver the whole trawl net to the big ship. There is only one vessel, the mothership Ocean Phoenix, that is more than 600 feet long.

There also is a tribal mothership and shoreside fishery that takes place off Washington state.

Each catcher-processor and mothership must carry two National Marine Fisheries Service observers on board.

Snouts are collected from each salmon sampled from the hauls so the snouts can be scanned for coded wire tags.

Shore-based trawlers also must carry cameras to monitor the catch, to make sure fishermen are not dumping a net or sorting fish during the whiting season. They also must carry observers some of the time. Each salmon on a shore-based trawler is identified and the snouts also collected.

Observers’ reports and bycatch statistics are available on the Web weekly during the season at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Groundfish-Halibut/Groundfish-Fishery-Management/Whiting-Management/index.cfm.

Full-season reports and data are checked and verified and usually made available to the Pacific Fishery Management Council when it meets in March.

The report that will be made to the council next week details how much salmon the whiting fleet caught last year.

-- The mothership sector caught 591 Chinook out of 47,809 metric tons of whiting.

-- The 10-ship fleet of catcher-processors caught 733 Chinook out of 73,263 metric tons of whiting; and

-- The shore-based sector caught 2,462 Chinook out of 72,751 metric tons of whiting.

The whiting fleet as a whole did run into some trouble a few years ago, in 2005, when 11,916 Chinook were caught. The fleet knew it, salmon fishermen knew it and the whiting fleet moved offshore — but not quite soon enough. At the same time, the National Marine Fisheries Service responded with an emergency rule that said the whiting fleet must fish deeper than 100 fathoms for the remainder of the season.

Often, it’s the tribal fleet off northern Washington that has the highest bycatch of salmon and not the fleets fishing off Oregon and northern California.

The tribal fishery is restricted to a single area off the Olympic Peninsula, and most of the salmon it intercepts are of Puget Sound  origin.

In 2003, 2004 and 2005, the tribal fishery caught more than 3,400 Chinook, while the catcher-processor sector caught less than half that.

Salmon fishermen were so concerned that, at an Oregon Salmon Commission meeting also in Newport Thursday, they requested federal lawmakers look into the issue.

“This is a problem for us and it seems to be ignored,” salmon troller Mike Lane said. “Apparently, it has to go to Congressional level.”

At the same time, though, he said: “I hate to pit one fishery against another,” recognizing that even though their vessels are bigger, they’re still fishermen, just like so many others in the room.

The Fishery Management Council will hear a full report of the whiting fleet’s activities when it meets next week in Sacramento. – Coos Bay World

To the editor: Unimak Pass needs rescue tug

Gov. Sarah Palin's standing up for the Exxon Valdez punitive verdict is laudable. But in so doing, she is stunningly hypocritical in that her administration remains unwilling to do the minimum necessary -- stationing a powerful rescue tug at Unimak Pass -- to prevent an Exxon Valdez or larger spill in the Aleutians, southern Bering Sea and Bristol Bay.

 Thousands of large ships each year transit this region -- one of the richest and most productive marine ecosystems on Earth -- including hundreds of tankers on "innocent passage" between Asia and North America. To date, there is not one adequate rescue tug in the region. We may have learned our lesson in Prince William Sound (where we now have 10 tugs for every loaded tanker a day), but we don't seem to be able to apply that lesson elsewhere.

 The Shipping Safety Partnership has been asking the state (and feds and industry) for many years to charter a powerful rescue tug for the Aleutians, one able to tow a disabled tanker or freighter (a la Selendang Ayu) out of harm's way and prevent major spills and loss of life. But so far, government and industry have simply stuck their heads in the mud, holding their breath in the hopes they'll dodge this bullet until the next election cycle.

 The Palin administration continues to ignore this urgent risk. So as the governor pleads for justice from the Exxon Valdez spill 19 years ago, she clearly needs to do more to prevent such catastrophes across Alaska in the future.  -- Rick Steiner, facilitator, Shipping Safety Partnership, Anchorage

California stream illustrates Chinook crash

SNELLING -- Tiny Chinook salmon -- from fingerlings the size of paper clips to slightly bigger fry -- darted around long troughs at the Merced River Hatchery in Snelling.

Fish and wildlife technicians Mary Serr and Lester Yamaguchi scooped up an ounce of the small fish to check their development. The goal is to keep as many young salmon as possible alive and healthy.

 Those that survive are now being released into the Merced River. The hope is that enough will return eventually in the fall to spawn and begin the process all over. Unfortunately, fewer of them are doing so.

 Surveys taken between October and early January found only 520 salmon in the river, said Tim Heyne, senior biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game.

Last year, that number was 1,470, and the year before the river had 1,921.

 In 2001 and 2002, about 10,000 fish were counted in the river.

 This drastic decline is causing wildlife managers and fishermen around the Tuolumne, Sacramento, Merced and Stanislaus rivers -- which are all experiencing record-low numbers -- to use words like "crisis" and "disaster."

State officials even warned fishermen during a meeting in Santa Rosa to expect restricted salmon fishing in the coming year.  – Sacramento Bee

Exxon and greedy commercial fishermen

Where's my money?  For that matter, where's yours?

 To be honest, that's all I think every time a greedy Exxon and a bunch of greedy commercial fishermen go back to court again to argue over billions of dollars in punitive damages for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.

 No doubt the thoughts would be different if Exxon were being punished to the benefit of all Alaskans.

 You want to punish the multi-national oil giant?

 How about requiring Exxon Mobil pay a year's profits -- $40.6 billion for 2007 -- in punitive damages to the Alaska Permanent Fund. All Alaskans would benefit from that.

Even poor, socially minded fools like myself would stand to benefit. As it is, my contact with the spill was to merely spend years observing and suffering through it.

 Unfortunately lacking in capitalism genes, I didn't manage to make a buck. There's sort of a pattern there.

 I missed out on the big money in construction of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline too by choosing a low-paying Fairbanks reporting job over a high-paying pipeline job. My excuse for the former was that I was young and stupid. I don't know what the excuse is for the latter.

 Had I been just a little bit of a capitalist, I could be sitting fat and pretty on a boat financed and paid off by Exxon. There are people out there smarter than I who did that.

And then there are the people who already had boats, made big bucks leasing them to Exxon, then collected "compensatory'' damages because they couldn't work their "real" jobs for the period of the cleanup when they were hauling loads of oil-spill greenbacks over the side.

 Let's face it, spending on the cleanup of the first massive Alaska oil spill was every bit as out of control as spending on the construction of the first massive Alaska petrochemical transportation line. A lot of people got paid to do little on both projects.

 It's not without reason that Alaskans still joke: "Please, God, give me one more pipeline. I promise I won't p--- all the money away this time."

 There were people in the early 1990s who made similar jokes about the oil spill. The money spent on clean up and compensation -- Exxon claims $3.4 billion -- definitely played a role in helping out an Alaska economy that was stagnating before the spill.

The thing about money, though, is that you can never have enough of it.

 Or at least some people can never have enough of it.

 Or at least as the system is set up, lawyers working for a cut of damages have no excuse to give up battling for more money until they run through the court system. That is, of course, where we're at now.

 The Supreme Court of the United States has heard the arguments and is contemplating whether Exxon should pay the $2.5 billion in punitive damages a court of appeals ordered up for 33,000 Alaska fishermen and business owners, with interest, $5 billion.

 Personally, I don't think Exxon can pay enough for its incompetence in this case, but the big question is who gets Exxon's money.

 As it stands today, only those who have already collected their "compensatory" damages get in on the windfall.

 Before collecting those compensatory payments, some of these people made big bucks doing work-little, collect-a-check jobs cleaning up the spill.

 I saw them. I was out there in Prince William Sound off and on through the long-running publicity stunt staged jointly by Exxon and government officials.

 All did their best to make it look like they were cleaning things up, but the reality is that nature cleaned more than man did.

 As someone who was in the Sound watching the cleanup, I've long wondered if it might not have ended up doing as much harm as good.

 I watched the young people on the beaches spraying hot water on oil, and to this day I can't help but wonder what weeks and months of inhaling the gas coming off the rocks as part of that exercise did to them.

 The protective gear they were given basically amounted to a set of Helly Hansens.

 "What we didn't know about oil then is killing us now: hundreds, and potentially thousands, of workers from the 1989 cleanup are suffering from debilitating respiratory difficulties, central nervous system problems (e.g., memory loss, brain fog, headaches), and heightened sensitivity to chemicals," according to the Alaska Community Action on Toxics, a public-interest organization. "Many have had to alter their lives and work to accommodate their illnesses."

 Where's their money?

  Some of these folks are people who only wanted to help by getting their hands dirty in the "cleanup" organized by Exxon, supported by government and endorsed by many of the same people now trying to collect just one more big check from the oil giant.

 Most of the these folks didn't know the cleanup was largely just a publicity stunt:

"Look at us. We're cleaning it all up. Aren't we noble and well-meaning?"

Yeah, sure. – Columnist Craig Medred writing in the Anchorage Daily News

 

Oregon racing too fast toward wave power plantations

Scientists working with the Oregon Ocean Policy Advisory Council say the state has set an "unreasonable timeline" for establishing a network of marine reserves.

In a memo sent to the Council Thursday, members of OPAC's Science and Technical Advisory Committee said the November deadline to select ocean sites doesn't leave enough time to ensure sound science.

Their concerns echo those of some North Coast leaders who have protested the rapid pace of the selection process, still set to begin April 1.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski has asked OPAC to recommend by November up to nine areas in Oregon's territorial sea that should be roped off as marine reserves and closed to fishing and other extractive activities. They would aim to boost scientific knowledge of nearshore ocean habitats and preserve biodiversity.

Kulongoski plans to allocate state funding for the reserves before the next legislative session.

But scientists advising OPAC say without allocating enough time and money to the scientific review of potential sites, the state runs the risk of making poor choices that could be costly in the long run.

"We are concerned that the pace of the process is precluding the incorporation of adequate scientific information and review, leaving open the potential for inadequately informed decisions and unintended consequences," they said in their memo.

Jay Rasmussen, the associate director of Oregon Sea Grant who chairs the Science and Technical Advisory Committee, said with the April 1 date rapidly approaching, his board doesn't have enough data to grade proposed sites, and it hasn't ruled on the proper size and spacing of the sites yet, either.

A lack of funding makes it difficult to collect information and hold meetings, said Rasmussen.

"Just putting on a size and spacing workshop taxes us to find the resources," he said.

The science committee meets in early April to discuss size and spacing, but that means OPAC won't have its conclusion for the scheduled start of the nomination process.

In a memo sent in November, the science committee said existing data on the state's territorial sea are "inadequate," and in order to evaluate marine reserve sites, "an aggressive program of data collection will have to begin immediately. No evidence of plans for such a program has been provided to the STAC."

Last week's memo renewed the call for a complete, scientific marine reserve development process.

OPAC Chairman Scott McMullen of Astoria called the science committee's memo "a significant development" that his board would address at its March 28 meeting in Newport.

"I would say we have to listen to STAC," he said. "We have STAC for a reason, and we need to respect and weigh what they tell us."

However, the looming question is whether the governor will offer a reprieve from his November deadline.

"One of the big drivers of the timeline is submitting a legislative request," said McMullen. "That's one of the key things we keep hearing form the governor's office is that the Nov. 1 deadline is important so the governor's office can put together a budget request for next legislative session."

Patty Wentz, a spokeswoman for the governor's office, said today her office will need more time to respond to the memo. – Pacific Fishing columnist Cassandra Marie Profita writing in The Daily Astorian

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 

Prepare for no Oregon-California salmon

So few salmon are living in the ocean and rivers along the Pacific Coast that salmon fishing in California and Oregon will have to be shut down completely this year unless an emergency exception is granted, Pacific Fishery Management Council representatives said Tuesday.

 It would mark the first time ever that the federal agency canceled the coast's traditional salmon fishing season from April to mid-November.

 Such a move would jeopardize the livelihoods of close to 1,000 commercial fishermen from Santa Barbara to Washington State and would significantly drive up the price of West Coast wild salmon.

 A decision to shut down the fishery also would kill recreational salmon fishing for some 2.4 million anglers in California, an activity that the American Sportfishing Association has estimated is worth $4 billion.

 The council is expected to make a recommendation in April to the National Marine Fisheries Service, which will make the final decision about what to do about the collapsing salmon fishery.

 "This is unprecedented," said Dave Bitts, a commercial salmon and crab fisherman based in Eureka. "The Sacramento fish are our bread and butter, and there are not even any crumbs. It's horrible. It means half or more of my income is not going to be there at all this year."

 The prospect of banning fishing came up during the first full day of presentations about the salmon crisis during the council's weeklong meeting at the Doubletree Hotel in Sacramento.

 The council's salmon management plan, first adopted as part of the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and amended several times since then, requires the council to close ocean fishing if the number of spawning salmon do not reach the conservation objectives set for the fishery.

 There are many ways to count fish, depending on what rivers and tributaries are included, but only 63,900 fall run salmon were documented spawning in the Sacramento River in 2007, far below the 122,000 to 189,000 objective the council had set.

 The doom and gloom brought on by the poor run was made worse by news that the number of jacks -- 2-year-old fish that return to the river a year early to spawn -- is the lowest ever recorded in the Central Valley fall run. Scientists use the number of jacks that return as an indicator of what next year's spawning season will look like.

 Fisheries experts expected 157,000 jacks, but counted only 6,000.

 What it means is that all fishing where the fall run Chinook are caught must be closed unless there is an emergency rule allowing an exemption, said Chuck Tracy, a staff officer for the council. Chinook from the Sacramento and its tributaries are caught in California, Oregon and Washington, but the catch in Washington is historically small enough that it might not fall under the rule.

 "Washington could be exempted, but California and Oregon will definitely be affected," Tracy said.

 Cape Falcon, in northern Oregon, would likely be the boundary for a fishery closure, said Peter Dygert, the fisheries management chief of the sustainable fisheries division of the National Marine Fisheries Service. "Any fishing south of Cape Falcon will have to be implemented under emergency rule. There are going to be relatively few fish in the ocean overall."

 The situation is so bad that there have been discussions during the meetings about declaring the salmon fishery a federal disaster, Tracy said.

 The Klamath and Trinity river run, another major salmon run along the Pacific Coast, was declared a disaster in 2006 after a similar collapse, freeing up money to help those who are financially dependent on the salmon industry. The Klamath and Trinity crisis led to a dismal commercial and recreational salmon catch last year.

 "This is the same situation we were in two years ago in the Klamath," Tracy said. At that time, "they did allow some fisheries in the ocean through an emergency rule."

 But, in many ways, the situation is even worse now. Peter Lawson, of the National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Marine Fisheries Science Center, told the council that five different salmon stocks in the three states have failed two years in a row, including Chinook and coho salmon.

 The emergency exemption allowed some fishing along the Pacific Coast after the salmon crisis on the Klamath, but Fisheries experts were hard pressed to come up with any excuse the council could use this time to justify an exception, given the dire circumstances.

 "The California, Oregon and Washington coastal stocks are all depressed," Tracy said. "The Sacramento fall Chinook are in the worst shape. Is it a crisis? If you are a commercial fisherman or someone who relies on the fishing industry, yes."

 The Sacramento River fall run, the San Francisco Bay's biggest wild salmon run, was the second worst on record for spawning Chinook. The worst year was in 1992, but the fishery recovered and as recently as 2002 there were hundreds of thousands of spawning salmon in the Sacramento watershed.

 At its peak, the fall run, which essentially means fish that are at their spawning peak in September and October, exceeded 800,000 fish. Over the past decade, the numbers had never fallen below 250,000 -- until this past fall.

 Fisheries experts say even if the salmon fishery remained wide open there would not be any salmon left to catch.

 The collapse is especially troublesome because the recreational and commercial fishing industries all along the Pacific coast depend on fish born in the Sacramento River and its tributaries. The Central Valley Chinook, or king, salmon pass through the San Francisco Bay after hatching in the river and roam the Pacific Ocean as far away as Alaska before returning three years later to the place where they were born.

 The fall run -- named for the time the fish pass through the Golden Gate returning to their native streams -- is, in fact, the last survivor of dozens of teeming salmon runs up and down the Pacific coast. The Central Valley's spring run may once have been the largest, but most of the habitat is now behind dams.

 The scientists, fishermen and tribal representatives at the meetings this week are trotting out various theories for the decline, including global warming, diversions of freshwater in the delta, pumping operations, a lack of nutrient rich deep ocean upwellings and exposure to pollutants. One document lists 46 possible reasons.

 Dygert said the death of so many salmon "is suggesting a broad-scale ocean survival problem."

 "One thing we know is that these fish had plenty of parents," said Bitts. "Something has happened since then."

 The council, which will propose three options for managing the fishery by the end of the week, asked staff scientists Tuesday to investigate a variety of possible causes, including hatchery operations and ecological changes in the ocean and fresh water environments.

 What's next: The Pacific Fishery Management Council, meeting in Sacramento, will consider recommendations by conservationists, biologists, tribal interests and fishing industry representatives. The council will propose three options Friday for what to do about this year's fishing season.

 The public can comment over the next month in writing or at hearings in Oregon and Washington on March 31 and in Eureka on April 1. – San Francisco Chroncle

Wonder what's behind the price for sea cucumber?

The Pacific Islands are bordered to the west and east by the Barrier Reef of Australia and the rocky reef shorelines of the Galapagos Islands in Ecuador.

Despite these two iconic systems having well financed fisheries management, both have recorded marked declines in their stocks of sea cucumbers. Declines that were serious enough to warrant fishery closures. Today, with 23% of the world’s population living in China, the biggest market for dried sea cucumbers (bêche-de-mer), and a continual upsurge in demand for sea cucumber products, these fisheries are under greater pressure than ever.

In the Pacific, this fishery has come a long way since the 1700 and 1800s when ships would periodically visit our fishing grounds to work with communities to catch and process single shipments of sea cucumbers.

Especially since the mid-1980s, increased market opportunity has seen a revolution in the momentum of sea cucumber harvesting activities, with a move from shallow water gleaning by communities to situations where teams of divers are contracted on wages to act at the bidding of marine product agents. -- Island Business, Fiji 

Kodiak's ComFish set to open

Alaska’s largest and longest running fisheries trade show is a little more than a week away and preparations for the big event are moving full speed ahead.

 The ComFish Alaska Trade Show and Fisheries Policy Forum is in its 29th year, and attracts hundreds of visitors to Kodiak each year.

 “ComFish provides a unique opportunity for people to bring their goods and services directly to the place where people in the fishing industry live and work,” said Deb King, executive director of the Kodiak Chamber of Commerce, which is sponsoring the event. “It is also a one-stop shop for stakeholders to get the latest information about issues affecting the seafood industry.”

 ComFish has evolved with time, King said, and for a while it was not certain the traditional tradeshow would happen this year.

 King said when ComFish first started, no one shopped online, and the tradeshow was an opportunity to see what was new in the commercial fishing world and make purchases.

“We recognize that change and had to redesign the show to accommodate that,” King said.

 The majority of the vendors at ComFish are state and other agencies with informational displays, King said.

 Informational sessions are offered ranging in topic from “Flooding Control: Knowledge and Tools to Prevent Sinking” to “Enriching Alaska’s King Crab Stocks.”

 A popular draw is a town meeting with Alaska Department of Fish and Game Commissioner Denby Lloyd, King said.

 There will also be a fisheries debate featuring Alaska candidates for Congress. Among those slated to debate are U.S. Rep. Don Young, Alaska Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux, Ethan Berkowitz, Diane Benson and Jake Metcalfe.

 The event will also include several family-friendly attractions, including “Kodiak Out Loud: Kodiak Fishing and the Sea,” modeled after FisherPoets events. It is a community celebration featuring Kodiak and Outside fishermen and mariners presenting poems, stories and songs about the maritime culture of Kodiak and other fishing towns. It is organized by Toby Sullivan.

 A Family Day and Health Fair is also scheduled for Saturday, March 22.

 While King did not have the exact number of attendees of past years, she said during the three-day event hotels are full and rental cars scarce.

 ComFish is the only event of its kind at a major fishing port. Kodiak is home to Alaska’s largest and most diverse fishing fleet, according to information in a press release, with more than 700 vessels homeported at its two harbors. Kodiak ranks in the top five U.S. fishing ports for seafood landings and value. More seafood processing companies are in Kodiak than anywhere in Alaska.

 The ComFish trade show is scheduled for March 20, 21 and 22 at Kodiak High School.

A full schedule of events is available online at www.comfishalaska.com, or call 486-5557 for more information. – Kodiak Daily Mirror

Coast Guard helos out injured fisherman

PORT ANGELES — Coast Guard Group/Air Station Port Angeles flew an injured fisherman from a commercial trawler about 30 miles west of Port Angeles on Saturday night.

The 40-foot fishing boat Puget Sound called the Coast Guard at about 8 p.m. on Saturday when one of the crewmen was injured.

The Puget Sound is a tribal fishing vessel registered to the Lower Elwha Klallam tribe, Petty Officer Jeff Pollinger, Coast Guard spokesman, said. The man was taken by helicopter to Olympic Medical Center where he was treated and released.

Neither the hospital nor Coast Guard revealed his name. Pollinger said he did not know the name of the man or the types of injuries he had suffered.

He did say the fisherman was a member of the Lower Elwha tribe. --  Peninsula Daily News

Oregon racing too fast toward wave power plantations

Scientists working with the Oregon Ocean Policy Advisory Council say the state has set an "unreasonable timeline" for establishing a network of marine reserves.

In a memo sent to the Council Thursday, members of OPAC's Science and Technical Advisory Committee said the November deadline to select ocean sites doesn't leave enough time to ensure sound science.

Their concerns echo those of some North Coast leaders who have protested the rapid pace of the selection process, still set to begin April 1.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski has asked OPAC to recommend by November up to nine areas in Oregon's territorial sea that should be roped off as marine reserves and closed to fishing and other extractive activities. They would aim to boost scientific knowledge of nearshore ocean habitats and preserve biodiversity.

Kulongoski plans to allocate state funding for the reserves before the next legislative session.

But scientists advising OPAC say without allocating enough time and money to the scientific review of potential sites, the state runs the risk of making poor choices that could be costly in the long run.

"We are concerned that the pace of the process is precluding the incorporation of adequate scientific information and review, leaving open the potential for inadequately informed decisions and unintended consequences," they said in their memo.

Jay Rasmussen, the associate director of Oregon Sea Grant who chairs the Science and Technical Advisory Committee, said with the April 1 date rapidly approaching, his board doesn't have enough data to grade proposed sites, and it hasn't ruled on the proper size and spacing of the sites yet, either.

A lack of funding makes it difficult to collect information and hold meetings, said Rasmussen.

"Just putting on a size and spacing workshop taxes us to find the resources," he said.

The science committee meets in early April to discuss size and spacing, but that means OPAC won't have its conclusion for the scheduled start of the nomination process.

In a memo sent in November, the science committee said existing data on the state's territorial sea are "inadequate," and in order to evaluate marine reserve sites, "an aggressive program of data collection will have to begin immediately. No evidence of plans for such a program has been provided to the STAC."

Last week's memo renewed the call for a complete, scientific marine reserve development process.

OPAC Chairman Scott McMullen of Astoria called the science committee's memo "a significant development" that his board would address at its March 28 meeting in Newport.

"I would say we have to listen to STAC," he said. "We have STAC for a reason, and we need to respect and weigh what they tell us."

However, the looming question is whether the governor will offer a reprieve from his November deadline.

"One of the big drivers of the timeline is submitting a legislative request," said McMullen. "That's one of the key things we keep hearing form the governor's office is that the Nov. 1 deadline is important so the governor's office can put together a budget request for next legislative session."

Patty Wentz, a spokeswoman for the governor's office, said today her office will need more time to respond to the memo. – Pacific Fishing columnist Cassandra Marie Profita writing in The Daily Astorian

Thursday, March 13, 2008 

Official: Chinook closes off most of coast

State and federal officials Wednesday morning took the pre-emptive step to close seven salmon fishing zones on the California and Oregon coasts earlier than usual to protect Chinook that remain alive in the ocean.

 The action came during a conference of state and federal wildlife officials gathered for the Pacific Fishery Management Council meetings this week in Sacramento, said Peter Dygert, a biologist at the National Marine Fisheries Service.

 The agencies decided early closures are needed because the council won't make a final ruling on the 2008 salmon season until mid-April, and seasons that normally open before then could jeopardize the species.

 The seven zones include two commercial fishing areas off the Oregon coast that were set to open Saturday and one California zone near Fort Bragg that would have opened April 7.

 The rest of the commercial season normally begins May 1.

 Opening of the two Oregon zones will be delayed until April 15 at the request of Oregon state officials. But Dygert said subsequent actions probably would keep them closed.

 Four recreational zones also were closed early. They cover the entirety of the Oregon and California coasts except for a zone near the Klamath River and were set to open either March 15 or April 5. One near Fort Bragg has already been open since Feb. 16 and will now be closed April 1. The others will not open as scheduled.

 The actions come amid a steep decline in the California Central Valley fall Chinook salmon run, a normally robust run that underpins the fishery in both states. Last year's run was the second-lowest in 35 years of record-keeping, and this year is likely to be worse. – Sacramento Bee

Chinook fishermen left with "crumbs"

SACRAMENTO  — We in the fishing industry have a saying, said salmon fisherman Ben Platt of Fort Bragg, Calif.

“Crumbs are bread, too.”

That pretty much sums up the potential salmon fishing opportunity for both sport and commercial fishermen in California, Oregon and Washington for the 2008 season. State and federal fishery managers, along with sport and commercial fishermen, are meeting this week in Sacramento to work through the arduous process of developing three potential season options.

There will be little to no opportunity this year.

The fishing industry has known for a couple months the outlook was dire. Returns of Central Valley fall Chinook were below biologists’ expectations and below the threshold fishery managers have determined is necessary for the stock remain sustainable. The Central Valley stock, primarily those returning to the Sacramento River, is the primary run that keeps West Coast fishermen working and sports anglers with the ability to enjoy ocean and in-river salmon fishing.

Returns of Chinook and coho to many streams and rivers on the West Coast are down, too — a situation that will have a crushing effect fishermen from the Canada to Mexico border, fishermen found out at the Pacific Fishery Management Council meeting.

Fishermen came to California believing there may be as many as 100,000 Chinook available to share between California and Oregon fleets.

But as state and federal scientists began to crunch numbers Monday and report to the council on Tuesday, downright scary figures emerged.

The “floor” — or number of Chinook that must return to the Sacramento to keep the stock sustainable — is 122,000. It’s also called the conservation objective.

In the fall of 2007, only 88,000 fish returned. That’s compared with a recent range of 267,900 in 2006 to 775,500 in 2002.

Biologists say that in 2008, the preliminary number of spawners returning to the Sacramento could be as low as around 59,000 — roughly half of the conservation objective.

And that’s with no commercial season this year, no sport season this year and no in-river sport season this year.

“This is the big hammer,” Newport commercial fisherman Bob Kemp said.

If any in-river sport fishing takes place, that number could drop even lower, to around 50,000.

Kemp, like other Oregon and Northern California fishermen who made it through the 2005 and 2006 disastrous season in which fishing was constrained due to low returns on the Klamath, seems numb. How could it get worse than 2006?

Still, fishermen asked for any opportunity that might be available and worked all day Monday and part of Tuesday to put together three options to take to the public for review.

Council members warned scientists and the fishing industry that one option would have to include zero fishing.

But when the California industry group reported back to the council, there was no zero option proposed for recreational fishermen.

California Department of Fish and Game council representative Marija Vojkovich took one of the options off the table and zeroed it out to no fishing.

“Also, consider in-river fishing in Central Valley as no retention in the fall,” Vojkovich added.

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife council representative Phil Anderson had some stern words for the whole West Coast industry.

“We all came here with various understandings,” Anderson said, “but it does not, in my view, represent a realistic range of alternatives. We need to do some more work. We have more cutting to do.”

Washington fishermen are facing constraints due primarily to the Columbia River tule Chinook stock; the Sacramento fish primarily provide opportunity for California and Oregon fleets.

Oregon commercial fleets hoped to have some fish available for ongoing genetic sampling studies. That, too, may be questionable.

But the week is still young.

“We do have some work to do here,” Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife representative Curt Melcher said.

The Salmon Technical Team — tribal, state and federal scientists — will continue to crunch numbers based on new season options such as decreased numbers of fishing days, lower bag limits or time and area closures — while fishermen and others involved in the industry will work on different options at Salmon Advisory Subpanel meetings.


Charleston troller Jeff Reeves traveled to the meeting as an Oregon Salmon Commission representative. He, like Kemp, was shaking his head in disbelief at the disaster that promises to be far worse than the one he just survived.

“This is a salmon collapse that’s unprecedented in my lifetime,” he said. – Coos Bay World

Business Toolbox: Your supply
Prepare for no Oregon-California salmon

So few salmon are living in the ocean and rivers along the Pacific Coast that salmon fishing in California and Oregon will have to be shut down completely this year unless an emergency exception is granted, Pacific Fishery Management Council representatives said.

 It would mark the first time ever that the federal agency canceled the coast's traditional salmon fishing season from April to mid-November.

 Such a move would jeopardize the livelihoods of close to 1,000 commercial fishermen from Santa Barbara to Washington State and would significantly drive up the price of West Coast wild salmon.

 A decision to shut down the fishery also would kill recreational salmon fishing for some 2.4 million anglers in California, an activity that the American Sportfishing Association has estimated is worth $4 billion.

 The council is expected to make a recommendation in April to the National Marine Fisheries Service, which will make the final decision about what to do about the collapsing salmon fishery.

 The council's salmon management plan, first adopted as part of the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and amended several times since then, requires the council to close ocean fishing if the number of spawning salmon do not reach the conservation objectives set for the fishery. – San Francisco Chroncle

Finding riches in a different sort of oil

Alaska's future fortunes could soon be fueled by another oil boom -- and it won't be from crude.

 Fish oils are the biggest buzz in the bio-products world, said Peter Bechtel, a U.S. Department of Agriculture researcher at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

 "We're seeing almost a revolution right now. Everyone is interested in the health benefits from omega 3 fatty acids, and Alaska's cold water marine fish are an excellent source," he said.

Several things are driving the bio-rally, especially in today's climate of "planet consciousness."

 "We have a huge amount of material in Alaska that isn't made into fillets or roe, and we need to do something with this. This is especially important to parts of the salmon industry in Southeast Alaska," Bechtel said.

 According to 2005 federal data, Alaska fishermen catch approximately 2.5 million metric tons of fish each year, yielding 1.3 million tons of waste – heads, guts, etc.

 A portion of that becomes fish meal or fertilizers. Bechtel said seafood companies are realizing there is lots more value in all that fish gurry.

 "Almost anything that can be made out of these byproducts has increased in value tremendously in the last couple of years," Bechtel said.

 The material can be made into fish oils, fish meals, supplements, gelatins from skins, and ingredients for farm animals, even ingredients for the cosmetic industry. Bechtel said fish oils can also cut energy needs in rural Alaska.

 "In Alaska a lot of fish oil can be made. The question is how much is it worth. The current price is the same as boiler fuel. It can be used to heat hot water and other things," he said.

 Bechtel said Alaska "is making tremendous strides in byproducts utilization -- one fish part at a time."

 Federal dollars could help fuel fish oil projects for Alaska fishermen.

 "Those would be value added products, because you're taking the fish and processing it into a new product. That absolutely would be eligible," said Dean Stewart, director of Business Programs for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development program in Palmer.

 Adding value can be as basic as heading and gutting, or chilling the fish.

 "The result is intended to allow agricultural producers to receive more benefit from the products they produce, instead of just selling it in the raw form," Stewart said.

 More than $18 million is available for the program nationwide. Up to $100,000 is available for planning grants and up to $300,000 as working capital grants. Stewart said the money can be used for branding and marketing programs, and custom processing.

 "Fishermen can contract for the processing. as long as they own the product and they get their own fish back. The cost of that processing is actually a working capital cost and can be a part of the reimbursement through the grant," he said.

 The value added grants apply to all active fishermen.

 "We keep hearing about pockets of fishermen and family processing activities, and we really think there are good opportunities for us to support these projects," Stewart said. --Seward Phoenix Log, Alaska

Farmed cod: Better tasting through chemistry

Cod farmers are scaling back on their predictions to be the next big boom in aquaculture.

 A few years ago industry watchers hailed cod as the next aquaculture gold rush and said world farmed production could approach 500 million pounds within a decade. But now cod farming appears to be floundering.

 Seafood.com editor John Sackton reports that fish growers in Norway, the world's cod farming leader, now say they will produce less than 10,000 tons of cod this year, not enough for a viable market.

 Farmers are saying attempts to grow the fish commercially have hit some big biological roadblocks. A major problem is that farmed cod reach sexual maturity much more quickly than wild fish -- sometimes within a year. That means when they reach market size 18 months later, the cod flesh has turned mushy, with no sales value. Selective breeding and other methods could solve the problem, but that takes money.

 Sackton said even with record wild cod prices, costs for successful aquaculture are high, and the problems have discouraged investors.

 Making farmed fish taste like a wild one is the latest investment of HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, one of the world's biggest tilapia growers, has created "sea-flavored" tilapia.

 HQ uses a secret mix of flavoring compounds and other high tech methods to "manipulate its farmed fish to taste like wild pollock."

 The company wants to break the hold that Alaska pollock has in the fast food and fish stick markets by better imitating the taste of wild fish. The Seattle-based HQ Maritime Industries, which touts itself as the leader in "zero toxin aquaculture," operates in China, the world's largest tilapia producer.

 The U.S. imports the most tilapia, and sales are growing at more than 30 percent a year. Worldwide, tilapia sales will likely top $4 billion by 2010.  -- RedOrbit

Friday, March 17, 2008 

West Coast Chinook: No way out

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The struggle continues.

State and federal fishery managers, faced with dire predictions of low fall Chinook spawning returns to the Sacramento River — as well as many other West Coast rivers — worked late into the night Tuesday and Wednesday to craft options for salmon fleets.

Likewise, commercial and recreational salmon fishermen from all three states worked with scientists to help determine how so few fish — 800-fish quotas for commercial fleets, one-fish bag limits for sport fishermen, in some instances — can best be divided.

It’s required creativity.

Hard work.

Heartache.

In the end, one option that keeps popping up in conversations is “zero fish.”

The Pacific Fishery Management Council on Wednesday again revised preliminary options and sent those options back to the Salmon Technical Team, a group of state and federal scientists, to model the time and area closures, lengths of fish allowed to be caught and other options to determine potential seasons’ effects on overall abundance.

Through it all, the Sacramento’s low numbers of returning spawners last year, 88,000 fish, followed by an even lower projected low return of about 59,000 fish in 2008, is the driving factor.

The situation is so unfamiliar that scientists had no way to predict the fleets’ ocean fishing effects on Sacramento returns — a stark contrast to the situation in recent years on the Klamath River.

Low returns to the Klamath have frustrated fleets and managers in recent years and once was the driving season-setting factor for much of Oregon’s South Coast fleets. The Klamath Ocean Harvest Model was designed to forecast potential ocean catch effects on the abundance of Klamath River fall Chinook.

But no model has been used for the Sacramento River. None has ever been needed. The stock has been stable.

Until now.

The Salmon Technical Team was forced to push the boundaries of fisheries science in Sacramento: It planned to adopt the Klamath Ocean Harvest Model to the Sacramento River.

“This is the first time I’ve ever seen this,” Charleston salmon troller Paul Heikkila said.

Heikkila, a retired Oregon Sea Grant Extension Agent, also is one of the industry’s representatives on the Salmon Advisory Subpanel. Unlike the technical team, the SAS comprises folks who bring real-world, on-the-fishing-grounds knowledge to the table to help guide the council and scientists on how proposed rules would affect the fleets.

The team reverted to old-school techniques to adapt the Klamath model to the Sacramento and related Central Valley stocks: Team members used good ol’ pencil and paper.

They outlined the rationale for the current model and how the Central Valley stocks differ. In handwritten notes, they identified variables, listed various components and identified math limitations and unknowns. Three pages packed full of equations with symbols, parentheses and brackets looked like every elementary school child’s nightmare.

And even after the new Sacramento model was put into the computer for the serious number-crunching, one thing remained clear: Zero fishing still is a viable option.

Governor names three to Fish Board

JUNEAU, Alaska – Governor Sarah Palin today announced her recommendations to the legislature for three vacancies on the Alaska Board of Fisheries. Governor Palin is recommending the reappointment of John Jensen, of Petersburg, and Mel Morris, of Kodiak, and the appointment of William Brown, of Juneau, to the board.

 Jensen is a lifelong resident of Petersburg and a third-generation commercial fisherman who has participated in fisheries since 1965. He has owned and operated many different commercial fishing vessels and has participated in fisheries in Southeast Alaska, Prince William Sound, Cook Inlet, the Gulf of Alaska, the Alaska Peninsula, Bristol Bay, the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, and Western Alaska. Jensen currently serves as vice chair of the board and is completing his second three-year term.

 Morris has been an Alaska resident for more than 50 years and currently resides in Kodiak. His background includes experience as a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, service in the U.S. Army and management of several fish processing companies. He currently operates M&M Marketing. Morris currently serves as chair of the board and is completing his second three-year term.

 Brown is a lifelong angler who has traveled extensively to experience new fishing opportunities. He received a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Colorado and spent many years as a professor of economics, most recently at the University of Alaska Southeast. Brown owns and operates a reel repair business. – Press release

Fishermen pack B.C. fish farm committee meeting

PORT McNEILL – A meeting of the regional aquaculture advisory committee was better attended than expected.

 The regional district committee was meeting to work on its terms of reference and discuss recent aquaculture issues. It was only the second meeting for the group, the first was in June 2007.

 But when the doors opened Feb. 27, about 45 people crowded into the regional district office. They were commercial fishermen, business owners operating in the Broughton Archipelago and Sointula residents.

 Despite the large crowd, chair Rod Sherrell proceeded with the agenda, but once the terms of reference and membership were discussed without resolution, comments from the floor were directed at Sherrell himself.

 “I am offended by the letter you wrote and I demand an apology and a retraction,” said John Dawson of Knight Inlet Heli-Sports, referring to a letter Sherrell wrote to Minister of Agriculture and Lands on behalf of the regional district.

 The letter, published in last week’s Gazette, expressed Sherrell’s “concern” that the minister met with business operators from the Broughton Archipelago to discuss moving fish farms from salmon migratory routes. Sherrell also expressed disappointment that business owners did not “want to have further dialogue on this unsettled and controversial issue.”

 But Sherrell refused to retract his statements. “I am not prepared to do that,” said Sherrell. “I think what I wrote in that letter was to tell the minister he needs to deal with the stakeholders in the community.”

 Sherrell did apologize for offending any one and hoped no one would withdraw from the committee. “I certainly hope my letter didn’t take away from the work of this committee,” said Sherrell. “I would hope no one would make decision they didn’t want to be on this committee because of my letter.”

 It was generally agreed the committee should move forward. The advisory committee is charged with learning about aquaculture issues and making recommendations to the regional district board.

 “I thought this would be a whitewash committee,” said Heidi Soltau, director for Area A. “But I’m very pleased ... with those being included on the committee.” The list includes first nations, industry, environmental groups, the provincial government and commercial fishermen.

 As the meeting concluded, and a date was being set for the next meeting, another issue came from the floor.

 “Chum and pinks are coming out of the rivers in the next weeks,” said biologist Jackie Hildering, urging the committee to meet as soon as possible. “You can’t stop nature. Those farms along the migratory routes have to go.”

 Living Oceans Society representative Will Soltau made a motion recommending the regional district support a plan by Alexandra Morton to move smolts past the fish farms during their pending out migration to avoid possible sea lice infestation. Morton and the Pacific Coast Salmon Society have applied for permission from Fisheries and Oceans Canada to move the smolts.

 “The ‘Namgis Band is giving money, boats and support to help Alexandra Morton,” said band representative Robert Mountain.

 Committee members were hesitant to make that recommendation, however, since their terms of reference and membership had not yet been determined.

 “We’re only a mere fraction of the committee,” said Heidi Soltau.

 The motion was withdrawn, and Hildering was told the request for support could be made directly at the next regional district board meeting Mar. 18 through a letter, a presentation or through director Heidi Soltau. – North Island Gazette, Port Hardy, B.C.

Feds to name panel to look at collapsed smelt runs

Federal officials plan to put together a scientific team to consider whether smelt runs south of the Canadian border deserve protection under the Endangered Species Act.

 A decision on whether recommend listing the species as vulnerable to extinction is expected in November, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said.

 NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service, formally accepted a petition from the Cowlitz Indian Tribe to list smelt populations in Washington, Oregon and California. The tribe submitted its petition in November.

 In 1999, NOAA Fisheries rejected a similar petition filed on behalf of Columbia River smelt by Olympia fish biologist Sam Wright in 1999.

 Smelt, also called eulachon or candlefish, are small, oceangoing fish that have lured fishermen to the Columbia River and its tributaries for thousands of years. They are oceangoing fish that return to rivers to spawn in late winter. – Tacoma News Tribune